The scope of Carney’s support for the lawless genocidal Jewish supremacist state is stunning. In the last few days, his government granted Netanyahu access to Canadian skies, a Liberal MP was punished for voting against arms shipments and they labelled it racist to oppose this century’s leading racist movement.

The term “terrorist” functions as a new form of invalidation—casting suspicion on everyone—and as a way to render absurd any discourse or action that is unsettling, revolutionary, or aimed at social emancipation. The West wields this anathema unreservedly and unfailingly to silence and discredit all armed opposition. Zionism makes excessive use of the “terrorist” label, with the particular habit of indiscriminately adding the charge of “antisemitism” to the mix—to the point where even my dog ​​could be called antisemitic. Branding someone a terrorist or an antisemite justifies every kind of duplicity

Recently ten lawyers and the Canadian Antisemitism Education Foundation sent a letter to the Law Society of Ontario to call on them to hear a motion to prevent graduates of Toronto Metropolitan University’s (TMU) law school from ever practising in the province. They want the Law Society to revoke TMU’s law degree granting authority because students at that university stood against the genocidal Jewish supremacist state.

Concurrently, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) “is lobbying the federal government to expand the grounds by which Canadian citizenship can be revoked.” According to The Maple, between March and July CIJA communicated with Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree, CSIS director Dan Rogers and Conservative MP Shuvaloy Majumdar on the matter

This vast reallocation of resources toward “defense” can only be achieved at the expense of social needs, public services, and infrastructure, even the economy itself. Accumulated debt is already skyrocketing, and further recourse to printing money would lead to hyperinflation and currency devaluation, particularly of the US dollar. The immediate objective is to fill the order books of the arms industry, in which US arms manufacturers would have the lion’s share. But the availability of military hardware, coupled with bellicose rhetoric, makes passing to action easier and points toward an increasingly violent future.