Déclaration de solidarité avec les campements sur les universités contre le génocide en cours à Gaza Palestiniens et Juifs Unis (PAJU) est solidaire des étudiants et étudiantes ainsi que du personnel enseignant de l'Université McGill et du monde entier qui...
Le sommet annuel sur le progrès de l'Institut Broadbent a évité la critique du génocide en cours en Palestine en faveur de platitudes sur la paix, la bonne gouvernance et l'innocence des colons Par Shama Rangwala Traduit de l'anglais par PAJU. * Phrases mises en gras...
Le rapport de fin d’année de la CDPQ au 31 décembre 2023 comprend plus de 14 milliards de dollars d’investissements dans des entreprises complices de crimes de guerre et de génocide israéliens. Cela représente un peu plus de 3 % du total des avoirs de la CDPQ,...
SUSAN ABULHAWA traduit de l'anglais par PAJU IL EST 20H00 à Gaza, en Palestine en ce moment, la fin de mon quatrième jour à Rafah et le premier moment où j'ai dû m'asseoir dans un endroit calme pour réfléchir. J'ai essayé de prendre des notes, des photos, des images...
Pro-Israeli groups have suffered a major defeat in a US court after a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit against the American Studies Association’s (ASA) resolution to endorse the call to boycott Israeli academic institutions as part of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.
The ruling is a significant victory for human rights campaigners and a blow to efforts by Israel lobby groups to use courts to harass, intimidate and silence supporters of Palestinian rights in US universities – a tactic known as lawfare. It’s also a major boost for Americans sacked from their jobs on the back of anti-BDS legislation, denounced by critics as unconstitutional.
Pro-Israeli group, the Louis D. Brandeis Centre, filed a lawsuit against ASA in April 2016 over its resolution to boycott Israeli academic institutions. The lawsuit argued that in adopting the resolution, which was voted on by an overwhelming democratic majority, the ASA operated beyond its corporate charter and caused the plaintiffs to “suffer significant economic and reputational damage.”
In the court’s 20-page ruling, US District Judge Rudolph Contreras wrote that the pro-Israeli group had “danced around key issues” and was unable to show that they had suffered enough monetary damages to warrant a federal case.
Radhika Sainath, senior attorney with the civil rights group Palestine Legal, summed up the court’s judgement saying that “the court basically said, in no uncertain words, that the plaintiffs suing ASA lied when they claimed to have ‘suffered significant economic and reputational damage’.”
One of the four co-defendants, Dr Stephen Salaita, an outspoken advocate of Palestinian rights who was fired from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for tweets criticising Israel’s 2014 assault on Gaza, said after the verdict: “I’m thrilled that this baseless case has been dismissed. It served no purpose other than persecuting those who dare to criticise Israeli policy and seek to end the occupation through peaceful means,”
Another co-defended Wesleyan University Professor, Kehaulani Kauanui denounced the lawsuit as a politically motivated attempt to suppress free speech. “The Brandeis Centre did not hold back its clear intent to punish me for standing up in solidarity with Palestinians and to deter others. They don’t call it law-fare for nothing.”
The court’s decision comes in the context of a broader federal assault on BDS for Palestinian human rights. On Tuesday, the US Senate passed a measure that would criminalise politically motivated boycotts of Israel across the US.
Adapted from: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20190207-us-federal-judge-dismisses-lawsuit-against-bds-supporters/
Distributed by PAJU (Palestinian and Jewish Unity)